Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
1. Announcement:Dev Blog: Long-Distance Travel Changes Inbound - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Fozzie wrote: Looking forward to getting this significant set of improvements for Nullsec released! Big thanks to the whole CSM for their help with this process so far and the good work I know they'll continue to do as we consult with them...
- by LtCol RTButts - at 2014.10.02 12:46:00
|
2. Announcement:Dev Blog: Long-Distance Travel Changes Inbound - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Ncc 1709 wrote: all these people crying about logistics. Do the math! going from cobalt edge to empire will take about 9 mins in a jump freighter or rorqual after the patch. just takes a few more cyno's and a 1 min wait at each jump theres al...
- by LtCol RTButts - at 2014.10.02 11:23:00
|
3. Announcement:Dev Blog: Long-Distance Travel Changes Inbound - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
sorry, but i have a RL and a family. there is not enough time left to wait for some more timers to move **** from A to B, especially when the timers can reach days, weeks, month, years .... you can reach in under 10 jumps the end of the EVE unive...
- by LtCol RTButts - at 2014.10.02 11:21:00
|
4. Sticky:[Oceanus] Cyno Exclusion Zone around starbases - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Inslander Wessette wrote: Dear CCP fozzie, I'll give a situation which u will solve for me ? Assuming U own 5 poses in a system say in "Khanid" region say "Upt" which has no stations 3 jumps out . And u wanna do maintenance on ur pos .. fuel...
- by LtCol RTButts - at 2014.09.18 15:38:00
|
5. CSM, pressure CCP to ban IsBoxer. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
ashley Eoner wrote: LtCol RTButts wrote: ashley Eoner wrote: Fire command is just as delayed as with the isboxer setup above since shooting yourself is bad and stuff. THe rest of your complaint is irrelevant as you're assuming the isboxe...
- by LtCol RTButts - at 2014.08.08 10:29:00
|
6. CSM, pressure CCP to ban IsBoxer. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
ashley Eoner wrote: Fire command is just as delayed as with the isboxer setup above since shooting yourself is bad and stuff. THe rest of your complaint is irrelevant as you're assuming the isboxer player has a magical computer with no system ...
- by LtCol RTButts - at 2014.07.31 17:48:00
|
7. CSM, pressure CCP to ban IsBoxer. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
2pt wrote: LtCol RTButts wrote: your comment and problems with different kind of ships doing differnet things shows me only that you [quote=LtCol RTButts]your comment and problems with different kind of ships doing differnet things shows me ...
- by LtCol RTButts - at 2014.07.28 21:57:00
|
8. CSM, pressure CCP to ban IsBoxer. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Iain Cariaba wrote: LtCol RTButts wrote: ISBoxer can still accomplish more than 10 multi boxed ALT+Tab accounts. 1) 1 person with ISBoxer Bomber squad can nuke complete fleets solo, it's impossible with multiboxing ALT+Tab 2) 10 ISBoxer rat...
- by LtCol RTButts - at 2014.07.19 00:16:00
|
9. CSM, pressure CCP to ban IsBoxer. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
your comment and problems with different kind of ships doing differnet things shows me only that you have no clue about how to manage things. and you are right, your advantages with ISBoxer are very limited. but anyways, time to create a legal ...
- by LtCol RTButts - at 2014.07.18 10:38:00
|
10. CSM, pressure CCP to ban IsBoxer. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
2pt wrote: After all the discussion I've read, it remains that ten accounts can accomplish no more than ten other accounts given the same number and types of ships with equivalent fits and skills operating in the same environments over the same...
- by LtCol RTButts - at 2014.07.18 09:08:00
|
11. CSM, pressure CCP to ban IsBoxer. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Adrie Atticus wrote: Pine Marten wrote: How is it argued that isboxer does not accelerate gain for someone? -snip- Conspiracy from within. You are comparing apples to oranges. Not a single character under the control of an ISBoxer entity ...
- by LtCol RTButts - at 2014.07.09 15:32:00
|
12. CSM, pressure CCP to ban IsBoxer. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
you can repeat it over and over again that ISBoxer didn't accelerate any gain, and it will be still completely wrong. you have no delay with ISBoxer compared to somebody who ALT#Tabs so you have a alpha damage without delay. you give all commands...
- by LtCol RTButts - at 2014.07.08 11:15:00
|
13. CSM, pressure CCP to ban IsBoxer. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Adrie Atticus wrote: Adunh Slavy wrote: Adrie Atticus wrote: So CCP should not be the one setting and enforcing policies related to a CCP product? Yep, it is their game and their reputation. If they want to look like double speaking ...
- by LtCol RTButts - at 2014.07.06 17:58:00
|
14. CSM, pressure CCP to ban IsBoxer. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Adrie Atticus wrote: Adunh Slavy wrote: Adrie Atticus wrote: Yes, but how is that relevant? It is entirely relevant. No one human could control so many other characters with out automated assistance. No one human, without assistance, ...
- by LtCol RTButts - at 2014.07.04 19:56:00
|
15. CSM, pressure CCP to ban IsBoxer. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Adrie Atticus wrote: Aiyshimin wrote: ashley Eoner wrote: He's earning isk at the same rate per account as anyone else. There's no acceleration involved... Exactly the same with ratting/mining/marketing bots, they earn ISK at the same ...
- by LtCol RTButts - at 2014.07.04 10:23:00
|
16. CSM, pressure CCP to ban IsBoxer. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
De'Veldrin wrote: LtCol RTButts wrote: and now math for advanced players. player A has finished his 40 hours for his PLEX. he does 4 hours a day so he has finished it after 10 days. in the next 20 days he earns another 2 PLEX, thats his yi...
- by LtCol RTButts - at 2014.07.04 06:47:00
|
17. CSM, pressure CCP to ban IsBoxer. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Adrie Atticus wrote: Nidal Fervor wrote: Adrie Atticus wrote: Quote: You may not use your own or any third-party software, macros or other stored rapid keystrokes or other patterns of play that facilitate acquisition of items, currency...
- by LtCol RTButts - at 2014.07.01 16:10:00
|
18. CSM, pressure CCP to ban IsBoxer. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
ashley Eoner wrote: LtCol RTButts wrote: it makes ISBoxer not more legit to tell that there are more tools to do the same. and nice computer array, well know as example but still bullshit. tell me how he controls his logis in an incursion f...
- by LtCol RTButts - at 2014.07.01 08:41:00
|
19. CSM, pressure CCP to ban IsBoxer. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
it makes ISBoxer not more legit to tell that there are more tools to do the same. and nice computer array, well know as example but still bullshit. tell me how he controls his logis in an incursion fleet via the same mouse and keyboard ? Yes, Yes...
- by LtCol RTButts - at 2014.07.01 08:16:00
|
20. CSM, pressure CCP to ban IsBoxer. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
De'Veldrin wrote: ashley Eoner wrote: It's so blatantly obvious that I didn't feel the need to even try to argue that angle. i just took their arguments to the logical conclusion. Figured that might have more of an effect then "ccp says it'...
- by LtCol RTButts - at 2014.07.01 07:15:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |